Manual validation
Automated tools help with coverage, but our assessment work focuses on analyst review, exploitability, chained risk, and business impact.
Toronto-based cybersecurity consulting
CyberProtect+ helps Canadian organizations understand where they are exposed, how an attacker could move, and which fixes will reduce the most risk. We combine manual testing, business-focused reporting, and remediation guidance your technical team can act on.
Modern security work should not end with a static report and a vague priority list. We identify real weaknesses, validate impact where it is safe to do so, map findings to business context, and help your team move from discovery to remediation with clear priorities.
What changes
Automated tools help with coverage, but our assessment work focuses on analyst review, exploitability, chained risk, and business impact.
Leadership gets plain-language risk themes. Technical teams get evidence, affected assets, severity, reproduction notes, and practical remediation steps.
Findings can be mapped to common expectations such as NIST CSF, CIS Controls, CISA CPGs, PCI DSS, SOC 2, PIPEDA, and internal audit requirements.
We help separate urgent exposure from routine hygiene, answer implementation questions, and retest critical fixes so progress is measurable.
Solutions
Manual testing for external and internal networks, web applications, APIs, cloud services, and exposed systems. We validate exploitable weaknesses, show realistic attack paths, and provide fixes your team can actually use.
Objective-based adversary simulation that tests people, process, and technology together. Red team work can include initial access, privilege escalation, lateral movement, detection review, and response lessons.
Asset-focused discovery across infrastructure, endpoints, and cloud surfaces. We reduce scanner noise, validate high-risk issues, and rank findings by exploitability, exposure, and business impact.
Credential exposure reviews for Active Directory and Microsoft identity environments. We identify weak, reused, stale, privileged, and policy-breaking password risk before it becomes an attacker foothold.
Structured security posture reviews that connect governance, controls, vendor risk, backups, identity, endpoint security, and incident readiness into a practical improvement roadmap.
Targeted phishing, pretexting, and awareness exercises that measure human risk, test reporting behavior, and reinforce safer habits without shaming the team.
Every engagement
Targets, testing windows, safety limits, communication paths, and success criteria are agreed before testing begins.
Each issue includes impact, affected assets, severity rationale, proof, likely attack path, and remediation guidance.
We group findings into urgent fixes, strategic improvements, quick wins, and items that need policy or architecture decisions.
Your team gets a close-out call, prioritized next steps, and validation support for critical or high-impact remediation work.
Method
Define assets, business impact, compliance drivers, rules of engagement, safety limits, and evidence expectations before testing begins.
Use attacker-informed techniques and manual validation to identify exploitable paths, chained weaknesses, identity risk, and detection gaps.
Translate findings into a ranked roadmap with severity, likely impact, remediation effort, affected systems, and suggested ownership.
Confirm fixes, refine controls, update residual risk, and help teams close the loop with measurable progress.
Sectors
Ready when you are
Tell us what you need to protect, what is keeping you up, and what you need proven. We will help shape the right assessment path, from a focused vulnerability review to a full adversary simulation.